ON THE ORIGIN OF THE SLAVS

"In regard to the Veneti themselves it cannot fail to be remarked that we meet with three tribes or na-tions of this name in other parts of the world, be-sides those of Italy, viz. the Gaulish tribe of the Veneti on the coast of Armorica; the Venedi or Veneti of Tacitus, a Sarmatian or Slavonian tribe on the shores of the Baltic; and the Heneti or Eneti, who are mentioned as existing in Paphlagonia in the time of Homer. {Iliad, ii. 85.) The name of this last people does not subsequently appear in history, and we are therefore wholly at a loss as to their ethnical affinities, but it is not improbable that it was the resemblance or rather identity of their name with that of the Italian Veneti (according to the Greek form of the latter) that gave rise to the strange story of Antenor having migrated to Venetia after the si-ege of Troy, and there founded the city of Patavium. (Liv. i. 1; Virg. Aen. i. 242 : Serv. ad loc.) This legend, so generally adopted by the Romans and later Greeks, seems to have been current as early aa the time. (Strab. xiii. p. 608.) Some writers, how-ever, omitted all mention of Antenor, and merely represented the tribe of the Heneti, after having lost their leader Pylaemenes in the Trojan War, as wan-dering through Thrace to the head of the Adriatic, where they ultimately established themselves." [1]

"On the other hand the existence of a tribe or pe-ople on the southern shores of the Baltic, who were known to the Romans (through their German neighbors) as Venedi or Veneti, a name evidently identical with that of the Wenden or Wends, by which the Slavonian race in general is still known to the Germans, would lead us to regard the Italian Veneti also as probably a Slavonian tribe : and this seems on the whole the most plausible hypothesis. There is nothing improbable in the circumstance that the Slavonians may at an early period have ex-tended their migrations as far as the head of the Adriatic, and left there a detached branch or off-shoot of their main stock. The commercial intercour-se of the Veneti with the shores of the Baltic, a traffic which we find already established at a very early period, may be the more readily explained if we suppose it to have been carried on by tribes of the same origin. Herodotus indeed represents the Veneti as an Illyrian tribe (i. 196, v. 9) ; but it seems probable that the name of Illyrians was applied in a vague sense to all the mountaineers that occupied the eastern coast of the Adriatic, and some of these may in ancient times have been of Slavonian origin, though the true Illyrians (the ancestors of the pre-sent Albanians) were undoubtedly a distinct peo-ple)." [2]

Since Herodotus mentions the Veneti as Illyrians, a logical question arises: how could the ancestors of today's Albanians also be Illyrians? The answer is clear: Illyrians are not a special ethnos, but the na-me "Illyrians" is based on the territory where some peoples live.

And what does the name ENETI, or VENETI, mean in the Greek translation of the Iliad in the singular Ἐνετῶν, in the plural Ένετοί; in Herodotus Ένετοὺς? It means FAMOUS, GLORIOUS, because Gallic, i.e. Briges, or Thracian or Illyrian ENET means FE-STIVAL, CELEBRATION [3], Serbian SLAVA (> SLAVS).

"The Wendes, Venetes, or Slavonians, who, when they first became known in Europe, were settled on the frontiers of Italy towards Tyrol and Carniola, spread by degrees into Rhaetia,or the country of the Grisons, into Suabia, and probably into Franconia. This race at present occupies the whole space comprised between the countries above-mentioned and the east coast of the Adriatic Sea, on one side, and the Frozen Ocean on the other. It was the de-scendants of the ancient Slavonians who penetra-ted into Kamtschatka, peopled the Aleutian Islands, and perhaps crossed over to the North American continent. The population of Russia, part of Turkey, and the dominions of the house of Austria, consists almost exclusively of Slavonians." [4]

"All historians agree that the Slavonians, Venetes, or Sarmatians, originally dwelt on the banks of the Tanais, Palus Maeotides, and Cimmerian Bospho-rus, countries lying eastward of llliyria and Dalma-tia." [5]

The mentioned "original place" is before the Veneti came to the eastern coast and the northern part of the Adriatic.

"The name which the modern nations of this race assume in preference is that of Slavenzi, or Slasvin, that is to say, the illustrious." [6]

Illustrious means FAMOUS, serbian SLAVNI.

"The physical qualities of the extensive nation kno-wn by the names of Slavonians, Wendes or Vene-tes, Getae, Jazyges, Antes and Serbians, vary much according to the climate of the country inha-bited by its different branches. The Russians and Tscheques, or Bohemians, are short and squat ; whi-le the Illyrians, Croats and Poles, are either tall or of good stature, and well-proportioned. The qua-lities of the water have a powerful influence on personal beauty and shape; so likewise have cli-mate, food, and the physical or moral habits of na-tions.

The different branches of the Slavonians are distin-guished by particular characteristics, as may be seen in the profiles which form the frontispiece to this volume. The Slavonian is a Sauromatian, dwel-ling to the north of the Carpathian mountains ; the Wende a descendant of the ancient Japides ; and the Illyrian an inhabitant of Croatia." [7]

"This race of men is ancient, and it is generally said that they rose to great fame while inhabiting the re-gion facing the Ionian Sea. They are now commonly called Bosnians. But the Dalmatians, Mysians, Tri-balli, and even the Sarmatians, use almost the sa-me language, or not very different, so that they understand each other with no difficulty. It is pro-bable, however, that they departed from the region which extends towards the Ionian Sea, since they were few in number and everywhere they became famous for their brave deeds. that they subdued Thrace, and having crossed the Ister, they inhabited the region of Sarmatia; but there are those who say that they were driven out by the Scythians and crossed into the region which is cultivated beyond the Ister, and having subdued Thrace, they came to the gulf and settled there. I am surprised, however, that there are those who think that the Illyrians are Albanians, as if the Illyrians, who occupy the gulf of the Ionian, had advanced into this continent and Aetolia and the region of Thessaly. But the whole region from Epidamnus to the gulf of Carnerium en-compasses a distance of three thousand stadia. — this region is occupied by one race of men using the same language. It extends from the Mediterranean, extending as far as the Ister, reaching the region of the Sandals, bordering on all sides the Triballi and Mysians. But I say this, mainly following this con-jecture, which is clear that the Illyrians attained great power and were scattered in many places throughout Thrace. Therefore, I believe that they should rather be called Illyrians than Albans. I also agree with those who they asserted that the Illyrians derived their name from the region. But, divided among themselves, some have a different language in use. Therefore, since many kinds of people live there, and their languages ​​are different from each other in use, I think that these people were destined for this name, so that they are called Illyrians." [8]

Ister is the Danube river. Today's modern Albanians are not the only descendants of the Illyrians, beca-use the Veneti who are the Thracian. By the political will of the West in 1912, Albanians were declared to be the only descendants of the Illyrians, which is a historical lie.

"Catari around Emona have names ol Venetic origin and may be a group ol the Carni. Except for the Latobici and Varciani, whose names arc Celtic, the civitates of Colapiani, Jasi, Breuci, Amantini and Scordisci were lllyrian. There is little known of the civitates in Moesia. In the south the Dardani rema-ined a single group, while the civitas of the Celegeri in the northwest may be newly formed out of the Scordisci." [9]

"The identity of the Thracians and Illyrians is proven by ancient writers, some earlier, some later, refer-ring to one and the same people." [10]

The old name of Slavs is the Veneti, Illyrians or Thracians with all the Thracian and Sarmatian peo-ples:

"This race of men is ancient, and it is generally said that they rose to great fame while inhabiting the region facing the Ionian Sea. They are now com-monly called Bosnians, but the Dalmatians, Mysi-ans, Triballi, and even the Sarmatians, use almost the same language, or not very different, so that they understand each other with no difficulty." [11]

The Cimmerians and Thracians were one people (Strabo i,3,21; xii,1,8). Later the Cimmerians are called Cimbri, after that they are called Celts and Gauls and they are all a branch of the Thracians. The Thracian Getae were later called Goths and they are Slavs:

"In ell these countries they were one and the same people, though subject to different princes, and kno-wn by different names. Thus, in Cimmeria, Sarma-tia, Scythia, they were called Cimmerians, Sarma-tians, Scythians; in Thrace, Dacia, and Moesia, Thracians, Dacians, and Moesians; and in the ne-ighbourhood of the Ister and the Pontus, Illirians and Pontics. As for the appellations of Westrogoths, softened by the Latins into that of Visigoths, and Ostrogoths, they were distinguished by the names as Grotius shews by Jornandes, before they left Scandinavia, being called Westrogoths and Ostro-goths, or Western and Eastern Goths, from their situation there to the east and west, the former inhabiting that part of Scandinavia, wich borders on Denmark, and the latter the more eastern parts, lying on the Baltic. What Jornandes writes of the various migrations and settlements of the Goths, is intirely agreeable to what we read in the antient Greek and Latin authors concerning the various migrations and settlements of the Getes. And truly that the Goths and Getes were one and the same people, is supposed by all the writers, who flou-rished in or near the times in wich both empires were over-run by them." [12]

Dacian Getae or Goths are Thracians and they are Slavs in the Balkans and beyond the borders of the Roman Empire:

"The Getae or Slavs attack the border of Thrace..." [13]

And to conclude who the Slavs were:

"The seventh book tells of the disordered ranks of the Romans and of their brave successes against the Slavs or Getae; for by that name they were for-merly called." [14]

ILIR is Gaelic, ie. Thracian, i.e. Illyrian word:

• IL = ARU [15],
• ARU = SHARP, STRONG, POWERFUL, BIG [16] (in the ancient original sense it is the SUN);
• LIR = LEAR [17];
• LEAR = HILL, HILL, MOUNTAIN [18].

IL + LIR > ILLIR > ILIR

Celtic IA means AREA, LAND, RESIDENCE [19].

ILLIR + IA > ILLIRIA > ILLIRIA = MOUNTAIN LAND, a name with the same meaning as HELM, HAE-MUS and BALKAN.

As descendants of the Illyrians, today's Albanians differ from the Thracians, i.e. Slavs, in that the Ro-man emperor Justinian II (reigned 685–695 and again 705–711) settled among the Thracian Albani-ans a part of the Lebanese-Armenian Saracens Mir-ditas (Greek: Mιρδȋται) [20]. On the same page abo-ve the cited Source in the footnote it is written:

"M. Sathas (op. cit. p. 53) says that they were di-vided into two bodies of which one was scattered throughout Hellas, especially Epirus, where to the present day their descendants are called Mirdites, Mírδȋται, while the other division was ultimately sett-led in the Cibyraiot theme. Sec Theophanes, 6178, 6179 a.m., and Constantine Porph. cle Adm. Imp. cap. 50, hi. p. 229." [21]

The descendants of the Saracenes Mirdites are the Albanian Ghegi and their language is related to the Berbers Saracene language, who were settled and expelled from Sicily and southern Italy to Albania by the Normans from the late 11th to the early 14th centuries:

“As soldiers in the army of Frederick II (1194-1250), Manfred (ca. 1232 1266), and Charles I (1226-1285), the Muslims of Lucera aroused awe in lands where they served, which included northern Italy, Albania, and possibly the crusader states.” [22]

.............................

[1] William Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography, Vol. II; Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1870, pg. 1272.

[2] Ib., p. 1273.

[3] Jean-Baptiste Bullet, Mémoires Sur La Langue Celtique, Tome II; Besançon: Claudi-Joseph Daclin, 1759, pg. 542.

[4] Frederic Shoberl, Illyria and Dalmatia, Volume I, Introduction xi-xii; London, Printed for R. Acker-mann, 1821.

[5] Ib. xiii.

[6] Ib.

[7] Ib. xvii-xviii.

[8] B. G. Niebuhr, Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae: Laonicus Chalcocondylas, De rebus Turcicis, L. X; Bonnae, Impensis Ed. Weberi, 1843, pg. 530-531.

[9] John Wilkes, The Illyrians; Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford, UK; Blackwell Publishers Inc., Cam-bridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1996, pg. 218.

[10] The Edinburgh Magazine and Literary Miscellany, Vol. 15, August 1824, Edinburgh, Prin-ted for Archibald Constable and Company, 1824, pg. 135.

[11] B. G. Niebuhr, Ib. pg. 530.

[12] An Universal History from the Earliest Account of Time to the Present: Compiled from Original Authors, and Illustrated with Maps, Cuts, Notes, and Other Tables. Vol. VII; London: Printed for T. Os-borne, J. Osborn, A. Millar, J. Hinton, 1792, pg. 487.

[13] Barthold Georg Niebuhr, Corpus Scriptorum Historiae, Continuata 10, Immanuel Bekkerus, The-ophylacti Simocattae, Historiarum, Libri Octo; Bo-nae, Impensis Ed. Weberi, 1834, pg. 9.

[14] Ib. pg. 14.

[20] J. B. Bury, History of the Later Roman Empire from Arcadius to Irene, Vol. II, Chapter X, Justinian II, London and New York, Macmillan and Co., pg. 321.

{21] Ib.

[22] Jan M. Ziolkowski, Dante and Islam;, New York, Fordham University Press, 2015.

ISBN 9780823263878

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20] J. B. Bury, History of the Later Roman Empire from Arcadius to Irene, Vol. II, Chapter X, Justinian II, London and New York, Macmillan and Co., pg. 321.

{21] Ib.

[22] Jan M. Ziolkowski, Dante and Islam;, New York, Fordham University Press, 2015.

ISBN 9780823263878

GOD'S WORD IS THE LAST (CHRONOLOGY FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF OUR WORLD)

As of March 3 2022, the fall of the Illuminati's global power begins, the cessation of all terrorist measures "against COVID-19" begins, and the sudden death of vaccine-poisoned people across the planet Earth begins. From this date begins the time said in the Book of the Prophet Daniel: "And the judgment has an hour, and they shall remove [his] dominion to abolish it, and to destroy it utterly." (Daniel, 7:26)

Here we will briefly show the chronology of our world from its beginning to its complete transformation in the period between 2035-2070 AD (Figure 4).

           One day of the Biblical creation corresponds to one day on the base of the Great Pyramid. The base of the Great Pyramid shows the time from the beginning of Creation to the Biblical Flood (Figure 4):

     A = the beginning of the Creation:
     • Day first = May 6, 10,000 BC;
     • Second day = May 7;
     • Third day = May 8;
     • Fourth day = May 9;
     • Fifth day = May 10;
     • Sixth day = may 11;
     • Seventh day= May 12;
• 5718  years  = genetic creation of  Adam.
     A1 = 1000 years;
    AF = time of the Biblical Flood = 7374.882 years from the end of the Creation = 1656.882 years from the creation of Adam.

            The height of the Great Pyramid shows the time from the Biblical Flood to the to the time of the transformation of this world:

     8 = 8000 years from the beginning of the Creation;
     9 = 9000 years; 
     10 = 10,000 years =  the time from the beginning of the  Creation to the  Christian era; 
     11 = 11,000 years;
     12 = 12,070 years = 2070 AD;
     FE (vertical distance) = 4694.99967 years;
     AFE = 7344.882 + 4694.99967 = 12,069.88167 years.

FROM  ADAM TO THE GREAT  FLOOD 

          According to the Great Pyramid and the Bible since the creation of Adam to a Great flood is a time of 1656 years.  Here are the years from Adam to the new born and Noah:

1. Adam: 5718 (+130) = 5848 > Seth,
2. Seth: 5848 (+105) = 5953 > Enosh,
3. Enosh: 5953 (+90) = 6043  > Kenan,
4. Kenan: 6043 (+70) = 6113 > Mahalalel,
5. Mahalalel: 6113 (+65) > Jared,
6. Jared: 6178 (+162) = 6340 > Enoch,
7. Enoch: 6340 (+65) = 6405 > Methuselah,
8. Methuselah: 6405 (+187) > Lamech,
9. Lamech: 6592 (+182) = 6774 > Noah

The birth of Noah: 6774 years from the beginning of the Creation. From the time of Adam to Noah is 10 generations.

            Noah was born 1056 years after the creation of Adam or 6774 years from the beginning of the Creation.

           “In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month – on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the havens were opened. And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.” (Gen.7:11-12)

Noah was born 1056 years after the creation of Adam:

     1056 + 600 = 1656 years from Adam to the Great Flood

According to the Great Pyramid Adam was created after 5718 years from the beginning of the Creation:

     5718 + 1656 = 7374 years from the beginning of the Creation:

• The length of first Pyramid's base = 365.242 sacred cubits,
• 1 sacred cubit = 20.19176875 years:

365.242 sacred cubits = 7374.882 years = November 18th, 7375 = the time of Flood.

            The flood started on the seventeenth day of the second month. The year 7374 ended on the January 13th  (winter solstice) and then began 7375th. It is a full 1656 years since the time Adam was created.

            The seventeenth day of the second month of that time was February 17th,1657th year from the creation of Adam, or 17th February 7376th year from the beginning of the creation of the world.

CIVILIZATION BEFORE THE FLOOD

         The Great Flood started on February 17, 2626.All prehistoric cultures older than 2700 years BC belong to the predivulian time. There was a civilization before the Flood and predivulian aristocracy had written language. The first instance of the language in ideogram-writing from is a group of texts dating to the Uruk IV period (3200 BC), later known as Sumerian pictographs.

          The beginning and the spread of predevulian civilization began after the Aliens created Adam and Eve (5718 years from the creation of the world, or 4282 BC). The descendants of Adam and Eve received the knowledge of the Aliens and began biologically to mix with the pre-Adamic race. Thus, a new race of people emerged.

Some of Adam's descendants became the first kings. Their first kingdom was created in Mesopotamia, and it is a predivulian Sumerian civilization. Here are the some of the first “Sumerian” kings who ruled Sumer, Egypt and India (1):

1^ST DYNASTY:  Names in King List and Monuments:      

3378-3349 BC: Uksi of Ukhu City or Udu, Uduin, or ODIN, Indar, Induru, Dur, Pur, Sakh, Sagaga, Zagg, Gaur or Adar;

3348-3337 BC:  Azam Ama Basam or Bakus,Tasia or Mukhla, Gin, Kan or Gan, or Nimmrud;

2^ND DYNASTY:

3336-3273 BC:  Azag Bakus or Gan at Unuk, Enoch or Erech City.

          One of the names of the first king is Odin: Odin is the principal gods in Norse mythology. The names of the second king are Bakus, Tasia and Mukhla: Bacchus was the Thracian and Roman god, Tasia or Mukhla:  The names of the second king are Bakus, Tasia, Mukhla:  these are pre-Christian names of archangel Michael.

         The first king of the Second dynasty was Enoch:

         “And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.”(Gen. 4:17)

         From 2725-2671 ruled powerful oldest Egyptian predynastic pharaoh Shar-Guni, Kin or Sargon.

         The Great Flood started on February 17, 2626 BC. From 2655-2641BC ruled the king with the name Manis-Tissu. The name “Manis-Tisu” is one of the names of the biblical Noah: Saskrit “Manu” is a term found with various meanings in Hinduism. In early texts, it refers to the archetypal man, or to the first man and progenitor of humanity. Mannus, according to the Roman writer Tacitus, was a figure in the creation myths of the Germanic tribes. Fifteen years before the Great Flood, Manis-Tissu left the throne and built the Ark. From the first to the last king there are 42 kings in total.   

…………………….
     (1) Laurence Austine Waddell, Egyptian Civilization: its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology, London, Luzak & Co., 1930, pp. 150-152.

CHRONOLOGY OF THE GREAT FLOOD 

 • The beginning of the Flood:

            “In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.” (Gen. 7:11)

• 17th  days of the second month: February 17, 2626 BC (after 601th Noah’s birthday).

            “And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.” (Gen. 7:12)

• February 17 – April 9.

             “And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.” (Gen. 7:24)   

• Water raises for 150 days: February 17 - July 28, 2626 BC.

            And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.” (Gen. 8:4)

• The Ark on Mount Ararat: 17 September 2626 BC.

             “And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.”(Gen. 8:5)

• Tops of mountains became visible: December 1, 2626 BC.

            “And it came to pass at the end of forty days, that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made: Also he sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters were abated from off the face of the ground; But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.”(Gen. 8:8-9)

• January 9, 2626 BC (the end of the year fell to the winter solstice on January 13th and was then the end of the year of 2626 BC).

             “And he stayed yet other seven days; and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark; And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.”(Gen. 8: 10-11)          

• Dove brings a branch of olive tree: January 16, 2625 BC.

             “And he stayed yet other seven days; and sent forth the dove; which returned not again unto him any more.” (Gen. 8:12)

• January 23, 2625 BC.

• The dove did not return = January 24, 2625 BC.

             “And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.” (Gen.8:13) 

• The Earth became dry = February 1, 2625 BC.

            “And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.”(Gen. 8:14)

• Noah goes on land on the second month after 602. Noah’s birthday = March 27, 2625 = 2624.867 BC = 1657.13 years from the creation of Adam = 7375.13 years from the beginning of the Creation.

FROM THE GREAT FLOOD TO THE EXODUS

          Descendants of Noah’s son Shem from second year of the Flood:

1. Arphaxad: 2625 BC (-35 years to son Shelah),
2. Shelah: 2590 BC ( -30 years to son Eber),
3. Eber: 2560 BC (-34 years to son Peleg),
4. Peleg: 2526 BC (- 30 years to son Reu),
5. Reu: 2496 BC (-32 years to son Serug),
6. Serug: 2464 BC (-30 years to son Nahor),
7. Nahor: 2434 BC (-29 years to son Terah),
8. Terah: 2405 BC (-70 years to son Abram),
9. Abram: 2335 BC (-100  years to son Isaac),
10. Isaac: 2235 BC (-60 years to son Jacob),
11. Jacob: 2175 BC (-90 years to son Joseph),
12. Joseph: 2085 BC
• Joseph was sold into Egypt: 2067 BC.
• Joseph comes before the pharaoh: 2055 BC. 
• The seven years of abundance in Egypt ended:   
2048  BC.                             
• Second year of famine years: 2045 BC. That year Jacob with his family came to Egypt. He was 130 years old.
• Since 2067 BC the Jews spent 430 years in Egypt: 2067-1637 BC.

FROM THE EXODUS TO KING DAVID

               The Great Pyramid tell us that the arriving of Israelites into the Promised Land, led by Joshua son of Nun, started in the year 1597 BC. In order to prove the accuracy of this moment we will mention all years of judges and the foreign kings above Israelites from Joshua to king David and Solomon.

Judges:                                        Time in years:

1. Joshua, the son of Nun (1597 -1547)……….. 50

2. Cushan-Rishathaim (Judg.3:8)…………………8

3. Othniel (Judg.3:11)……………………………..40

4. Eglon (Judg.3:14)……………………………… 18

5. Ehud (Judg.3:30)…………………………........ 80

6. Jabin (Judg.4:3)…………………………………20

7. Deborah (Judg.5:31)……………………………40

8. Midianites (Judg.6:1)…………………............... 7

9. Gideon (Judg.8:28)……………………………..40

10. Abimelech (Judg.9:22)………………………....3

11. Tola (Judg.10:2)………………………………. 23

12. Jair ((Judg.10:3)………………………………. 22

13. Gilead (Judg.10:8)……………………………. 18

14. Jephthah (Judg.12:7)…………………………...6

15. Ibzan (Judg.12:9)………………………………..7

16. Elon (judg.12:11)……………………………….10

17. Abdon (Judg.12:13-14)………………………....8

18. Philistines (Judg.13:1), Samson: 20 years….40

19. Eli (1 Sam.4:18)..………………………………40

                                 Total time of judges: 480 years

            The sum of the above numbers is 480 years. Bua there is no that  is the actual lengths of the judges’ period. The judgeship of Samuel is not included in the years are not given.

Samuel was the last of the judges:

            “And Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life.” (1 Sam.7:15)

What does "all the days of his life" mean? The Bible says that a priest had to be 30 years old before he took up the mature, senior office of priest:

            "From thirty years old and upward even until fifty years old, all that enter into the host, to do the work in the tabernacle of the congregation.” (Num.4:3)

Samuel could not become a judge before he was 30 years of age:

           “And it came to pass, when Samuel was old, that he made his sons judges over Israel.”

At age 60, man is not very old, but with 70 years of age he is. That means that Samuel was a judge of his 30 to at least 70 years of his life: Samuel was a judge for 40 years and then he proclaimed his sons for judges. His sons were judges until the beginning of the rule of King Saul: 1050 BC:

            “The following dates, however, provide an approximate chronological framework for the times of Samuel, Saul and David.

     1105 B.C. Birth of Samuel (1Sa 1:20)

     1080         Birth of Saul

     1050         Saul anointed to be king (1Sa 10:1)

     1040         Birth of David

     1025         David anointed to be Saul’s successor   (1Sa 16:1-13)

    1010        Death of Saul and beginning of David’s reign over Juda in Hebron (1Sa 31:4-6; 2Sa 2:1,4,11).” (1)

          From the start of judging by Joshua son of Nun, in the year 1597 BC to the year of Saul’s anointment 1050 is 547 years, and the chronology of the Bible gives 480 years to the time to the a time of a judge Samuel (Samuel is the successor to judge Eli). Samuel was a judge about 40 years, and his sons were about 5 years:

   • 480 + 45 = 525 years:
   • 547 -  525 = 22 years

What about these 22 years of difference? This time has been lost in the period between the former judge and choosing the new judge. The causes of wars, sickness,  or disagreements did not always aloud the right time for choosing a new judge.  This is how those 22 years accumulated.

            Saul lost life in the year 1010 BC and David became a king. Solomon started to build the Temple in the year 967 BC:

            “In the 480 year after the Israelites had come out of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month of Ziv, the second month, he began to build the temple of the Lord.” (1 Kings 6:1)

Here is transcribing error: isn't 480, but 580 years:

     967 + 580 = 1547 BC: “So Joshua let the people depart, every man unto his inheritance.” (Joshua, 24:28)

            History is not important at all here: here are important numbers of the Bible. 

.........................

    (1) Zondervan NIV Study Bible (Fully Revised) Wide Margin Looseleaf Edition, Hendrickson  Publishers, Inc; Peabody, MA, 2005, p. 374. ISBN 9781565639867

SRBI SRUŠILI SU ZAPADNO RIMSKO CARSTVO

Da ja ne bih pricao o Srbima, neka pričaju isto-riografi:

      “Mnogi autori, kao Appianus Alexandrinus, i Ph. Cluverius pod imenom Kelti uključuju Gale, Ger-mane, Spanijarde, Britone, Ilire, itd. ali je sigurno to da Polybius, Diodorus, Plutarch, Ptolemy, Strabo, Athenæus and Josephus zovu ove narode koji su zauzeli Galiju, Keltima.” [1]

     “Cluverius u svojoj ‘Germania Antiqua’, ob-javljenoj 1616. dokazuje da Iliri, Germani, Gali, bas-kijska plemena i drevni Britoni, svi govore dijalekte jednog i istog jezika, koji je, računajući po njemu, bio keltski, i on iznosi sebi u prilog najimpozantniju naučnost.” [2]

To je jezik:

      “Monosyllabic Primeval Language > Agglutinate: Turanian > Amalggamate: Japhetic or Iranian or Indoeuropean > Celtic: Thracian or Illirian…” [3]

O Tračanim, Ilirima i Kimerima:

      “Identitet Tračana i Ilira je dokazan od drevnih pisaca upućujući, neki raniji i neki kasniji, na jednan isti narod.” [4]

      “Jezik Kimera nije poznat. Pretpostavlja se da je bio trački, da su govorili tračko-ilirskim, ili indo-iranskim…” [5]

      "Tamo su bili Brigi, rod Kimera, koji su prešli preko, iz Trakije u Aziju pod imenom Frigi, neko vrijeme nakon Trojanskog rata, kadgod da se to dogodilo." [6]

Kimeri (kasniji Kelti) i Tračani jedan su rod:

     "Kimeri, ili odvojeno pleme njihovo, zvano Treri...." [7]

Nakon toga Strabon opet kaže:

      "Sljedeći dio zemlje bio je okupiran od strane Trera, koji su također bili Tračani...." [8]

      “KIMERI, -ōrum, tračko pleme sa boravištem na Dnjepru.” [9]

      “Posebno je zaključeno da su drevni Kimerci i njihovi potomci Tauri od Herodota i narodi potčinjeni kraljevima Kimerskog Bosfora, među kojima su nađena tračka imena Kotis, Rheskuporis, Rhæ-metalkes, Mæsades, Berisades, Medosades, bili su tračkog porijekla.“ [10]

      “Istoričari izvještavaju o Aezir narodu kao Trako-Kimerima, jer su Trojanci od tračkih pre-daka.” [11]

Pominjući Herodota ispod citirani autor kaže:

      “Svi narodi sjeverno od Grka zvani su nekad od njih Tračanima, uključujući Kimere, i kimerijski Kerčonis nekad je zvan Taurika ili Trački Kerčonis.” [12]

      "Vidjeli smo da je u prehelenističkom periodu vladajuća klasa Pantikapeuma bila cimerijanska i da su Kimeri Tračani." [13]

      "Ser Isak Njutn (Chron., p. 1125) piše: 'Drevni stanovnici Dakije (Transilvanija, Moldavija i Vala-čija) od Grka su zvani Geti, od Latina Daci, a sami su se zvali Gotima'." [14]

      “Nema sumnje da su Daci ili Dani, kao i Geti ili Goti, bili svi od rase zvane Kimbri. Kimbri su takođe Kimeri, od tračkog su originala takođe, ili su Tračani bili Kimeri, što nije ni bitno.” [15]

      I ko je srušio zapadno Rimsko carstvo? Zaključujući po navedenim citatima Rim su srušili oni što su ih Grci zvali Getima, Latini Dacima, a oni su sebe zvali Gotima: Goti su Dačani, Dačani su Tračani, Tračani su Kimeri.

      Istorijska je prevara i naučna je laž ranije i ondašnje Germane poistovjećivati sa kasnijim Ni-jemcima, jer Cezar kaza da su Kelti Belgi (Belgae) porijeklom Germani:

      "Plerosque Belgas esse ortos a Germanis", tj. potiču od Kelta iz Germanije.

      Šta znači ime “Got” i “Goti” (gotski Gut-þiuda, latinski Gothi)? Najstariji zapisi imena GOT nalaze se na sumerskim pečatima kao titularno ime su-merskog cara Sargona:

      “Na jednom od ovih pečata on nosi ime ‘Sagara,’ identično sa jednom njegovom solarnom titulom u indijskim epovima; na drugom ‘Sag’ što je očigledno skraćeno od ‘Sagara’. Na tri od ovih njegovo ime je napisano ‘kralj Gin’ (Shar-um-Sharu-Gin) i na dva piše ‘Gan’ ili ‘Gana’. Na tri od njih on je dodao titulu Gūt (ili ‘Goth’) i na jednom on sebe naziva ‘Veliki Khāti’ (ili Khatti, ili ‘Hitt-ite).” [16]

Kao i svi carevi tako i Sargon sebi pripisuje titule solarnog značenja. Titula Gothima isto značenje kao i ime GOT. Kanarisko (Kannada jezik, narodni sanskrit Indije) GOTTU znači ZNAK, SIMBOL, SLOVO [17]. Kanarisko GHATTI, koje znači JAK, NESALOMIV, MOĆAN, BISTAR [18] odgovara značenju sumerskog KHATTI. 

      Pošto su Goti bili Dačani, Dačani bili Tračani, Tračani bili Kimeri, Kimeri bili Kimbri, Kimbri su bili Kelti, Kelti bili Gali, dakle u preživjelim keltskim dijalektima treba tražiti značenje imena Got.

   Starokeltsko GOTH (gaelik GATH) je SUNČANI ZRAK, ŽAR GULJA (dio točka) [19]. Tako dolazimo do zaključka da je sumerski kori-jen Gū- u sumerskom Gūt istoznačan starokelt-skom go- u starokeltskom goth i korijenu ga- u gaeliku gath i srpskom gu- u riječima gulja, je-gulja, guja, guta, guber. Od istog korijena gu- je tur-sko Gunes sa značenjem Sunce [20], tartar-sko gundus što znači dan [21], velško gunneisa značenjem vrelina, buktinja [22], velško got, goth, gothi što znači ponos [23] i sa istim značenjem korniško gothys, gothis [24].

      Irsko gorm počinje korijenom go- i znači toplota, grijati [25]. To isto znači i srp-sko gorjeti. Starokeltsko goth je sunčani trak, pravac, žica, struna [26]. I eto nas kod ime-na Tračana: trak > Trakoi > Tračani = Dačani = Geti = Goti i sve se odnosi na Sunce, jer je srpsko go znači čisto, mlado [27]. Golot je sjaj, kristal, biljur [28], god je simbol, znak slova O, znak kruga Sunca u vremenu godine (kanarisko gottu), ali je i veselje, proslava, slava [29]. Gotsko God znači Bog [30], kod Srba KRUG LJETORASTA U STABLU.

Sve što je nalik na go je s godno, tj. zgodno (lijepo i privlačno), a Goti su kao Sunčevi tračni traci, sjajni, proslavljeni, Slavni liuda (gotsko liuda znači narod i od toga je sveslovensko ljudi [31].

   “Procopius i Jornandes, Jerome i Spartian slažu se u identičnosti Geta i Gota. Ova indentičnost      podržana je visokim autoritetom W. Grimm čiji argument, izvučen iz teutonskog karaktera dačanskog imena biljke Dioscorides, nedavno je s velikom sposobnošću potvrđen od Mr. Douse. Canon Rawilson ide tako daleko da potvrđuje da je ‘identitet Geta sa Gotima kasnijeg vremena više nego vjerovatna pretpostavka i može se smatrati istorijskom sigurnošću." [32]

      I ko je u 5. vijeku srušio Rim? Srušili su Dačani Geti ili Goti, a to su Tračani ili Slaveni izvan granica Rimskog carstva:

      "Geti ili Slaveni napadaju granicu Trakije..." [33]

      "Sedma knjiga govori o nesređenim redovima Rimljana i o njihovim hrabrim uspjesima protiv Slavena ili Geta; jer su se tim imenom prije nazivali." [34]

I da ne zaboravimo: u vrijeme kad su zauzeli Rim, ovi Goti, tj. Slaveni, odnosno Srbi, bili su hrišćani, arijanci.

…………………………..

[1] The Southern Rewieu, Vol. 5, February & May 1830, Charleston: Printed and published by A. E. Miller, 1830, pg. 367.

[2] The New York Review, Vol. 1, New-York: Geoge Dearborn & CO, 1837, pg. 111.

[3] David N. Livingstone, Adam's Ancestors: Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins; Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008, pg. 103.

[4] The Edinburgh Magazine and Literary Miscella-ny, Vol. 15; Edinburgh: Printed for Archibald Constable and Company, 1824, pg. 135.

[5] Carl Waldman and Catherine Mason, Encyclopedia of European Peoples, Vol. 2; New York: Facts On File Inc., An Imprint of Infobase Publishung, 2006, pg. 175.

[6] Edward Davies, Celtic researches, on the origin, traditions & language of the ancient Britons; London: Printed and sold by J. Booth, 1804, pg. 205.

[7] Strabon, I,3,21.

[8] Ib. XIII,1,8.

[9] Frederick Percival Leverett, A New and copious lexicon of the Latin language; Boston: J. H. Wilkins and R. B. Carter, and Hilliard, Gray and Co.; New York: Leavitt, Lord & Co., 1836, pg. 140.

[10] James Cowles Prichard, Researches Into the Physical History of Mankind, Thirdh Edition, Volume 3 – Part I; London: Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper, 1841, pg. 474.

[11] Roger Calverley, The Primal Runes: Arche-types of Invocation and Empowerment, Preface XI;, Twin Lakes, Wisconsin: Lotus Press, 2005.

[12] John Pym Yeatman, The Shemetic Origin of the Nations of Western Europe; London: Burns and Oates, 1879, pg. 213.

[13] Michael Rostovtzeff, Iranians and Greeks in South Russia; Oxford, The Clarendon Press, 1922, p. 67.

[14] John Pym Yeatman, The Shemetic Origin of the Nations of Western Europe; London: Burns and Oates, 1879, pg. 212; Charles Adiel Lewis Totten, The philosophy of history, New Haven, Conn.: The Our Race Publishing Company, 1891. pg. 81.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Laurence Austine Waddell, Egyptian Civilization: its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology; London, Luzak & Co., 1930, p. 29.

[17] William Reeve, A Dictionary Canarese and English, Revised; Bangalore: The Wesleyan Mission Press, 1858, p. 393.

[18] Ibid., p. 402.

[19] Edward Dwelly, A Gaelic Dictionary, Vol. I; Herne Bay: E. Macdonald & CO., The Gaelic Press, 1902-, p. 518, 480.

[20] Arthur James Johnes, Philological proofs of the original unity and recent origin of the Human Race; London, Samuel Clarke, 1843, p. 21.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Ibid.

[23] Titus Levis, A Welsh-English dictionary: Geirlyfr Cymraeg a Saesneg; Carmarthen, J. Evans, 1815, p. 141.

[24] Frederick W. P. Jago, An English-Cornish Dictionary; London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co.; Plymouth: W. H. Luke, Printer and Publisher, 1887, p. 125.

[25] Arthur James Johnes, Ibid. p. 21.

[26] Robert Archibald Armstrong, Gaelic Dictionary; London, Printed for James Duncan, 1825, p. 309.

[27] Petar Skok, Etimologijski rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika, Knjiga I; JAZU, Zagreb, 1971, str. 582.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid., str. 583.

[30] Henry Bradley, The Story of the Goths, Apendix; New York, G. P. Putnam’s & Sons; London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1888, p.369.

[31] Ibid.

[32] Isaac Taylor, Greeks and Goths: A Study on the Runes; London: Maccmilan And Co., 1879, p. 44.

[33] Barthold Georg Niebuhr, Corpus Scriptorum Historiae, Continuata 10, Immanuel Bekkerus, Theophylacti Simocattae, Historiarum, Libri Octo; Bonae, Impensis Ed. Weberi, 1834, p. 9.

[34] Ibid. p. 14.