Wednesday, August 14, 2024

CIMMERIANS (CELTS OR GAULS) ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WITH THRACIANS, SKYTHIANS, SARMATIANS, GETTI OR GOTHS, i.e. SERBS or SLAVS

 
  

"In all these countries they were one and the same people, though subject to different princes, and known by different names. Thus, in Cimmeria, Sar-matia, Scythia, they were called Cimmerians, Sar-matians, Schytians; in Thrace, Dacia, and Moesia, Thracians, Dacians, and Moesians, and in the nei-ghbourhood of the Ister and the Pontus, Istrians, and Pontics. As for the appellations of Westro-goths, softened by the Latins into that of Visigoths, and Ostrogoths, they were distinguished by these names, as Grotius shows from Jornandes, before they left Scandinavia, being called Westrogoths, and Ostrogoths, or Western and Eastern Goths, from their situation there to the east and west, the former inhabiting that part of Scandinavia, with borders on Denmark, and the latter the more eastern parts lying on the Baltic. What Jornandes writes of the warious migrations and settlements of the Gots, is intirely agreeable to what we read in the ancient Greek and Latin authors, concerning the various migrations and settlements of the Getes. And trulyy that the Goths and Getes were one and the same people, is supposed by all the writers, who flourished in or near the times, in which both empires where over-run by them." [1]
The quote states that the Cimmerians, whom the Greeks later called Celts, and J. Caesar called Gauls, were one and the same people with the Thracians and Scythians, i.e. the Getae or Goths, and that they spoke the same language. These are the claims of all the authors who preceded the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815 and the Congress of Berlin in 1878, when the church Illuminati began to falsify history and all social sciences and biology.
..............................
[1] An Universal History from the Earliest Account of Time to the Present: Compiled from Original Authors, and Illustrated with Maps, Cuts, Notes, and Other Tables. Vol. VII; London: Printed for T. Os-borne, J. Osborn, A. Millar, J. Hinton, 1792, pg. 487.

No comments: